>> i think ryan's still in play. >> so charlie, you write, "how romney can change the subject. romney has a chance to hit the reset button with his vice presidential pick. it's not like his choice itself is likely to make that much difference, unless it's a bad one, but it is likely to begin a new and different narrative, shifting the focus away his finances and his critical review of the united kingdom's handling of preparations for the london olympics, and that's probably a good thing. it's highly unlikely that he will announce a game-changing pick. my odds are there's a 40% chance each of former minnesota governor tim pawlenty and senator rob portman of ohio getting the nod and only a 20% chance of it being someone different. but it will change the subject, at least for a time." then doesn't he have a chance to define himself? >> he could, but by traditional calendars, getting request ting out, trying to bond and connect with the voters in the convention makes sense. so the question is, how much has the calendar changed? to me, paul ryan, that would be game changing. i think